HighestWelfare.Humane.Assured.GoodPractices.Vegetarian. Regenerative.Flexitarian.Lies...
What is the difference between No Welfare, High Welfare, and Highest Welfare when they all require animals to die? Only human comfort, NONE protect the actual animals. The most humane, ethical, and honest Webster-defined "welfare" is NOT exploiting animals - not using, not wearing, not eating, not killing - animals. The only meaningful position is vegan, everything else is just how humans euphemize animals' required suffering and violent deaths: no human exploits animals because they honestly believe that NOT exploiting animals is UNethical or INhumane.
Pitbull fights ‘not for animal lovers’

From BB: There has been an article printed that actively encourages dog fighting and puts it on some sort of pedestal, describing how it creates an amazing bond between the owner and pet. Please register your opposition on the article comments and also email the parties listed following the article.
From IOL News
By Bongiwe Mchunu
You can hear the snarls, yelps and barking. You can smell the blood and urine. But, in this place some would call cruel, you can also feel the love, a bond between a person and a dog.
Soweto’s pitbull fighting scene is a murky, secretive world. These young boys and men – who urge on their animals to bite, gouge and sometimes kill other dogs – would be hated by most animal lovers.
Yet to watch them as they feed and groom their dogs, and then gently tend their gashes and bites after the fights, is to see something deeply touching.
Their dogs have unusual names: Frankenstein, Cable, Diesel, Scratch, Sakzana and a puppy named Hitler.
Frankenstein is a stocky, muscled, mainly white pitbull who carries the scars of previous battles all over his body.
He’s just come out of a bloody encounter with Cable, an equally powerful black-and-white dog. Frankenstein’s hair is spotted with blood, his own and that of his adversary. Minutes earlier he was a killer in a thrashing and brutal contest, but now he is calm, soothed by the hands cleaning out his wounds. Hands he trusts.
“Eish sorry mfana kuzolunga (sorry boy, it will be fine),” says Frankenstein’s owner. Frankenstein can feel his wounds, that much is clear as he winces on occasion. But he doesn’t growl or show any aggression towards his owner.
One of the boys explains that the animals are bathed straight after the fights: “If we don’t do this as soon as possible, they will get infections and I don’t want my dog to get sick, you understand suster.”
When I enter this illegal world, clearly some of them feel I am a threat. I have to assure them I will be discreet because, as they put it, “old people tend to call the police when they witness these fights”.
The fights happen mostly during the day and I get calls at short notice. The clashes normally don’t take long and they disperse quickly, leaving those in the fight area none the wiser.
Their dogs have unusual names: Frankenstein, Cable, Diesel, Scratch, Sakzana and a puppy named Hitler.
The dogs come in different colours and definitely have different attitudes. There are friendlier dogs, who will play with a “diski” (a soccer ball) before a fight, and some not so friendly.
Yet to watch them as they feed and groom their dogs, and then gently tend their gashes and bites after the fights, is to see something deeply touching.
As I follow them and document their underground society, I become attached to the dogs. It hurts me to watch them as they lie down, bloody and tired after a fight.
So why do they do it?
For the boys, it is simple. “This is nature taking its course. These dogs were born to fight and would be bored out of their minds if they did not,” says one of the boys.
In all the time I follow the boys and record the violent encounters between the dogs, I don’t see any money change hands. They don’t do this for money.
But it is not only the dogs who get hurt.
The owner of Mercy, a big bitch who is a black-brown colour with white patches, is almost in tears when he phones me to tell me she has been stolen. The dogs are sought after as guard animals. Better than a gun, some say. Other boys, like Cable’s owner, tether their dogs with sturdy chains and hefty padlocks.
When I visit Amber’s owner, he removes his hat and battles the tears. He’s the tough guy who told me these dogs were born to fight. “Eish suster, the puppies have died.”
He tells me they succumbed to biliary. “I tried to treat them with medicines I have, but by the time I rushed them to a doctor they had died,” he says.
Amber has been taking their deaths badly.
“I have been taking her for walks and a swim at the park a lot these days just to console her,” he adds.
On another occasion, Magogo (“granny” – so called because at four she is regarded as old) is listless as she lies at her owner’s feet after her fight.
“Ukhathele (she is tired); maybe I should carry her,” he says. “You see, suster, she is old now, she just needs water,” he says as he whispers soothing words in her ear.
A few days later, his mother reveals that Magogo is pregnant. She does not know that her son fights the dog.
There are smiles all round. He is happy. His dog is happy. It is a happy day.
~~~
If you object to this type of journalism, as well as the vicious story content, please comment on the article and consider sending the following people a message as well:
- You can mail IOL here: http://www.iol.co.za/feedback
- Mail Redi at 702 here: redi@primedia.co.za
- The press ombudsman here: johanr@ombudsman.org.za or khanyim@ombudsman.org.za
Related, UK Friends
Vodpod videos no longer available.
RELATED, as provided in Please speak out! Philly Newspaper issues front cover to Michael Vick calling him “Top Dog”:
Off The Chain
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Off the Chain is an unprecedented look into the underground world of dog fighting. Beginning with a history of the American Pit Bull Terrier, the film explores the evolution of the breed. Classic film and television footage show the popularity of what was once considered a noble and trustworthy family pet. Examine how this breed went from America’s dog to public enemy number one. Travel to the back alleys and dark corners of the inner city to expose the truth behind the breed’s new status in pop culture; an urban symbol for violence, aggression and gang-life. The first documentary of it’s kind; director Bobby J. Brown spent three years infiltrating the underground subculture of pit-bull fighting. Gaining the trust of well established dog men, they allowed him to film behind their dangerous veil of secrecy.
Underground Dog Fighting
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Three Tortured, Raped Just For Being Gay
Related, please visit and take action on the two alerts:
Vigil For Society’s Casualties
From Care2
By Jessica Pieklo
In response to the horrific and escalating accounts of assaults and teen suicides all linked to that person’s sexual identity, the “Make It Better Project” has launched a nation-wide initiative aimed at raising awareness and saving lives. Events have been planned all over the country including for October 11, National Coming Out Day. Steve Williams has done an amazing job reporting on both inspiring and heartbreaking stories as part of that effort to make sure not another person is abused, intimidated or dehumanized because of their sexuality and I suggest you check out his work if you haven’t had a chance yet to do so.
Because then you’ll hear stories like this and wonder, like I did, how could it get any worse for some folks?
Nine attackers, ranging in age from 16 to 23 and calling themselves the Latin King Goonies kidnapped, beat and sodomized two teenage boys until the boys confessed to having sex with another man. With those confessions in hand, they lured another man, age 30, to a house with a promise of a party. Instead of a party “Goonies” went on to kidnap, beat and sodomize the man for over 10 hours, going so far as to go to his house, attack his brother, and rob him.
All because the man was gay.
The rest of the lurid details of the crime can be found in the reporting by The New York Times, and frankly, it turns my stomach too much to recount them here. Instead, I urge you to push your legislators for immediate passage of the Student Non-Discrimination Act and the Safe Schools Improvement Act –pieces of legislation designed to get to the heart of the problem of bias-based bullying.
Please help Hungary’s animals, victims of the ecological disaster
From Facebook event:
HELP HUNGARY’S ANIMALS….VICTIMS OF THE ECO DISASTER IN HUNGARY
***Please note that the above links can only be accessed with a valid Facebook account.
Please help the Hungarian animals who have been affected by the recent toxic sludge disaster, which has affected a huge area in Eastern Europe. See below for donation information and additional pictures. Keep reading for background details.
Demotix: Since the first day of the ecological disaster in Devecser and Kolontar, the Rescue Team of the NOE Animal Shelter Foundation have tried to find the survivor animals from the two places. In the last five days they have rescued more than 50 dogs, approximately 100 cats, and other animals from the chemically-infected area.
Background:
From the above videos:
Hungary has declared a state of emergency in three regions after deadly toxic sludge flooded two villages on Monday, killing four people. It happened when a waste reservoir at an aluminum plant burst. Around 120 people were taken to hospital suffering from chemical burns.
Hungary says it will take at least a year and cost millions of dollars to clean up the damage caused by a spill of industrial toxic red sludge. Emergency workers are trying to stop the substance flowing into major waterways. A state of emergency has been declared in three western counties after the chemical waste burst from a reservoir, killing 4 and injuring 120 others. Authorities have called the toxic spill an “ecological disaster”.
How you can help:
- Chip-in donation in Hungarian language: http://www.adhat.hu/onlineadomany/56790
- NOE’s English language webpage: http://www.noeallatotthon.hu/index.php?lang=en
- Another Chip-in Donation web site http://dankasanimals.chipin.com/hungarian-animals
- And here is their link if you would like to wire/transfer money directly: http://www.noeallatotthon.hu/index.php?pid=2&cid=2&lang=en
- We just learned of this German chip-in website in Germany for the animal victims of Hungary: http://www.interessengemeinschaft-grenzenlos.de/patenschaftsantrag/geldspendeonline.php
For additional information and images, please visit The Rescue Team of Noe Animal Shelter Foundation in Work In Devecser
More information about the rescue work from the organisation NOE HERE, including pictures, rescue and animal details, and further donation directions.
Some of the saved animals who need treatment can be seen HERE.
The money will help fund Silent Roar and further to the organisation helping the animals directly, NOE.
Surrender is not a part of our vocabulary – stop the slaughter now!
By Jude Love
Dedicated to the Horses who spilled their blood, lost their lives, and gave up their Freedom For BLM.
American horses continue to be transported to Mexico and Canada for slaughter, to be used as food for human consumption. The only way to stop the torture of American horses in other countries is federal bill H.R. 503 and the Senate version of the bill, S.B. 727.
As John Holland, founder and president of Equine Welfare Alliance, put it, “Horse slaughter is not a ‘necessary evil’, as the industry claims, it is simply evil. Now is our opportunity to resign this practice to the dust bin of American history.”
American Horses being shipped to Slaughter in Mexico. The trip takes hours in the blazing heat, there are long waits at the border for paperwork to be completed, and the horses are deprived of water and food.
WARNING – THIS VIDEO IS GRAPHIC.
Per Laura Allen, Attorney for Animal Law Coalition, there is still time to stop this EVIL which is bringing Eternal Shame upon the Americans. Click HERE or on the following link.
http://www.animallawcoalition.com/horse-slaughter/article/1443
Last month U.S. Rep. James Moran presented a letter to Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, calling on her to schedule a vote on the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, H.R. 503, the bill to stop the slaughter of American horses for human consumption.
WHAT YOU CAN DO NOW
- Call on Speaker Pelosi at (202) 225-0100 to schedule a vote NOW on H.R. 503!
- Call on Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid at (202)-224-3542 / Fax: (202)-224-7327 to schedule a vote NOW on the Senate version, S.B. 727.
- Call on Assistant Majority Leader Sen. Dick Durbin at (202) 224-2152 / Fax (202) 228-0400, to schedule a vote NOW on the Senate version, S.B. 727.
- Call your representatives and senators.
THIS IS THE PERFECT TIME TO CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES and SENATORS. Mid-Term Elections will be held in THREE (3) Weeks, and Your Representatives want to be Re-Elected.
Click HERE (or on the link) to find your representative and your two (2) senators. Click on your state. CALL NOW to speak for the horses being sent to slaughter.
http://www.contactingthecongress.org/
Tell your representative and senators that you urge them SIGN ON AS A CO-SPONSOR to the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, H.R. 503/S.B. 727.
Following are graphic videos of American horses being slaughtered in Canada. Nothing will stop this evil cruelty except for a United States federal law. Call Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, your federal representative, your senators NOW.
Tell your representative and senators that you urge them SIGN ON AS A CO-SPONSOR to the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, H.R. 503/S.B. 727.
GRAPHIC VIDEO. HORSES LOSE THEIR FOOTING BECAUSE OF FEAR, AND FALL.
Tell your Representatives and Senators that you want them to sign on as CO-SPONSOR OF the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, H.R. 503/S.B. 727.
GRAPHIC VIDEO OF WHIPPINGS, BEATINGS AND ELECTRIC PRODDINGS, TOO NUMEROUS TO COUNT. AMERICAN HORSES IN CANADIAN SLAUGHTER HOUSES.
Tell your Representatives and Senators that you want them to SIGN ON AS CO-SPONSOR OF the Prevention of Equine Cruelty Act, H.R. 503/S.B. 727.
What your money funds : Top Ten Reasons Why Animal Research is Cruel
From IDA
Every year, the federal government, led by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), spends billions of tax dollars to underwrite biomedical experiments on animals. In Defense of Animals unveils its “Top 10 Reasons Why Animal Research is a Cruel Joke” in recognition of ridiculous, wasteful, and perverse research.
Selected from scientific papers published in 2009 and 2010 (as well as one from 2008), these experiments were funded by the NIH, approved by federally mandated oversight committees, and published in peer-reviewed journals. These experiments—the cream of the crop—show that your tax dollars and animals’ lives are frivolously wasted on research that adds nothing to medical progress and tells us nothing we care to know—or didn’t know already. One can only wonder what happens in the experiments that don’t get published…
These studies are simply the tip of the iceberg – IDA will continue to expose to the taxpaying public these ridiculous and wasteful experiments on a regular basis to demonstrate the reality of animal experimentation funded by a fundamentally broken tax-supported NIH system.
While reading these study summaries, you may ask yourself: Is this some twisted April Fool’s joke?
We wish it were.
WARNING: THE FOLLOWING CONTAINS SEXUAL AND/OR GRAPHIC CONTENT
All of the following are actual experiments conducted on live animals with your money:
10) 4 OUT OF 5 SCIENTISTS SURVEYED RECOMMEND EJACULATION TO RATS
Four researchers at the University of Western Ontario’s School of Medicine and Dentistry and one researcher at the University of Cincinnati studied whether male rats enjoyed ejaculation or intromission (the insertion of the penis into the vagina) more. Their data support the hypothesis that there is a hierarchy of sexual pleasure, with ejaculation at the top.
9) CHIMPS IN WORLD’S WORST ORPHANAGE CONDITIONS
Conditions that were “standard care” at primate centers until the 1990s.
8 ) THANKS TO THESE SCIENTISTS, CASTRATED HAMSTERS CAN STILL ‘GET IT UP’
7) RATS TRAPPED IN UNCOMFORTABLE PLACES FOR A LONG TIME GET ‘FREAKED OUT’
Monkeys too.
6) MOST MEMORABLE MOMENT IN RUMINANT HISTORY
5) DON’T CASTRATE YOUR CHILDREN, SAY SCIENTISTS
From the NIH Intramural Research Program, which boasts the only lab ever charged with multiple counts of criminal animal cruelty!
4) A FIGHT TO THE DEATH – BUT NOT BETWEEN LIZARDS
3) WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT? EXERCISE MAY HELP
From the researcher who discovered that adopted children fare better than orphans and social support alleviates depression.
2) MICE NEED ONLY WHEEL, NOT SHOCKS, FOR WHEEL-RUNNING
1) SCIENTISTS FIND VAGINAL STIMULATION MIGHT BE PLEASURABLE
Funded by a “high risk, high reward” NIH breakthrough grant!
10) 4 OUT OF 5 SCIENTISTS SURVEYED RECOMMEND EJACULATION TO RATS:
Four researchers at the University of Western Ontario’s School of Medicine and Dentistry and one researcher at the University of Cincinnati studied whether male rats enjoyed ejaculation or intromission (the insertion of the penis into the vagina) more. Their data support the hypothesis that there is a hierarchy of sexual pleasure, with ejaculation at the top!
Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).
9) CHIMPS IN WORLD’S WORST ORPHANAGE CONDITIONS:
Researchers at the Great Ape Nursery at Yerkes National Primate Research Center studied forty-six chimpanzee infants who were separated from their mothers and were receiving either “standard care” – only necessary medical attention – or “responsive care” – which included 4 hours of age-appropriate interaction. Responsive care stimulated chimpanzees’ cognitive and emotional development, while standard care caused abnormal behavior similar to that of human infants raised in “Greek, Russian, or Romanian orphanages.”
An interesting afterthought: the “standard care” described here actually was “standard care” at Yerkes until the 1990s! This is the same National Primate Research Center system, comprised of eight Primate Research Centers, that has cost over $1.3 billion since 1992 simply to maintain its “base grants” (that figure does not include the 30 years between 1960 and 1992) and published such results as“Sex differences in rhesus monkey toy preferences” and “Androgen-induced yawning in rhesus monkey females.” Three of the experiments on this list were funded by three separate Primate Research Center base grants, in addition to other NIH grants.
Funded by the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR – multiple, including the base grant for the Yerkes National Primate Research Center) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
8 ) THANKS TO THESE SCIENTISTS, CASTRATED HAMSTERS CAN STILL ‘GET IT UP’:
Researchers at University of California – Berkeley, University of Virginia and Columbia University used various concentrations of testosterone injected at various frequencies into castrated, sexually-experienced male Syrian hamsters in order to define the optimum concentration for maintaining ejaculation.
Funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
7) RATS TRAPPED IN UNCOMFORTABLE PLACES FOR A LONG TIME GET FREAKED OUT:
In a study by scientists at San Diego State University, Colorado State University and the University of Arizona College of Medicine, experimenters subjected rats to either restraint – in which they were immobilized in a Plexiglas tube – or confinement – in which they were immobilized in a mesh cylinder with free air flow – under various conditions. Ultimately, they found that the increase in rats’ body temperatures in restraint was probably due to anxiety as well as physical discomfort, while in confinement, it was “primarily psychological.” This experiment was supported by a grant for the study of fetal alcohol exposure.
In a similar study conducted at the California National Primate Research Center with a grant awarded for AIDS research in addition to the Primate Center base grant, experimenters found that rhesus monkeys restrained in “primate chairs” two hours a day, for seven consecutive days, showed signs of acute and chronic stress. The restraint of monkeys in primate chairs is a procedure that is commonly used in experiments requiring the immobilization of a conscious animal.
Rodent study funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA); primate study funded by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR – base grant for the California National Primate Research Center).
6) MOST MEMORABLE MOMENT IN RUMINANT HISTORY:
According to researchers at the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Texas at San Antonio and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Suffolk sheep became the first ruminant species used to study otoacoustic emissions (sounds produced by the inner ear). Some sheep were given sex hormones during prenatal development, while others had their testes or ovaries surgically removed after birth. Female sheep showed stronger emissions than males, a finding already seen in rhesus monkeys and humans. No spontaneous emissions were found in any sheep – “a common finding in non-human species.”
Funded by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
5) DON’T CASTRATE YOUR CHILDREN, SAY SCIENTISTS:
National Institute of Mental Health intramural researchers at the NIMH Primate Core Facility in Poolesville, MD, found that castrated male monkeys showed more subordinate behavior and less dominant behavior than intact male monkeys. The researchers ultimately found that intact gonads played an important role in adolescent social behaviour. Who knew?
Given that this is the same facility that discovered that monkeys raised without mothers showed signs of mood and anxiety disorders – what did you expect? Both of these studies were funded by the NIH Intramural Research Program, which received half a billion tax dollars in 2009 Recovery Act funding for infrastructure alone and boasts the only lab ever charged with multiple counts of criminal animal cruelty.
Funded by NIH intramural grants.
4) A FIGHT TO THE DEATH – BUT NOT BETWEEN LIZARDS:
In a study created by scientists from Harvard University and the University of South Dakota, Vermillion, experimenters forced territorial male lizards (Anolis carolinensis) to fight each another by introducing them into the same cage. In these lizards, social status is “often established via aggressive interaction, the intensity of which is dependent on the motivation and initiative of the combatants.” After 31 pairs of lizards had fought each other and recovered for three days, the experimenters killed them all. Twenty of these lizards were immediately decapitated, twenty were “restrained” (to stress them out) for 90 seconds in the hands of an experimenter to “restrict all movement except that necessary for respiration” before they were decapitated, and the last twenty-two were “restrained” for 90 seconds, then given 5 more minutes to live before they were decapitated. Another 12 lizards, belonging to a control group that had not been “fought,” were also decapitated. Of course, all of this was necessary to study the effects of stress on lizards of varying social status, and thereby, to advance modern medicine.
Funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR).
3) WANT TO LOSE WEIGHT? EXERCISE MAY HELP:
Researchers at the Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) and Oregon National Primate Research Center (ONPRC) used rhesus monkeys to show that exercise contributes to weight loss more than just eating less. In a local newspaper article about the experiment, a clinical researcher noted that rhesus monkeys are a poor model for humans, as they are much less likely to lose weight through dieting, and that the general conclusion has already been found in past studies with human volunteers.
In 23 years, the researcher responsible for this study has received 137 NIH grants. The “breakthroughs” of her long, taxpayer-funded career include: adopted children fare better than orphans; adolescents are more sensitive to social stress; social support alleviates depression; exercise improves brain function. All of these “discoveries” were first found in human studies long before she manufactured a monkey “model.”
Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), and the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR – base grant for Oregon National Primate Research Center).
2) MICE NEED ONLY WHEEL, NOT SHOCKS, FOR WHEEL-RUNNING:
A study by scientists at the University of North Carolina – Charlotte and Appalachian State University tested how consistent mice were in performing an endurance exercise like wheel running. They found that voluntary wheel-running was a “repeatable” behavior with consistent performance measurements, whereas electrically shocking mice to motivate them to run to “exhaustion” led to inconsistent results.
Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and the National Institute of Arthitis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS).
1) SCIENTISTS FIND VAGINAL STIMULATION MIGHT BE PLEASURABLE:
Experiments performed at Dartmouth College tested whether sexual intercourse, vaginal stimulation and social contact are able to cause female rats to prefer a particular place where they occur. They found that intercourse and artificial vaginal stimulation induced the place preference, whereas social interaction and the control treatment did not – hinting that vaginal stimulation may play a role in the pleasurable effects of mating in female rats.
In the Acknowledgements section of their paper, the experimenters thank a colleague for guidance on the “application” of artificial vaginocervical stimulation – which involved holding the rats by their tails, then inserting a 1 ml plunger into their vaginas until they contacted the cervix, delivering 15 stimulations every 30 seconds.
The NIH has received criticism – even from past directors – that it systematically funds incremental, redundant research and discourages revolutionary science using cutting-edge technology. As a response, the NIH has created “R21” grants for “High risk high reward studies that may lead to a breakthrough in a particular area.” It’s a great idea…in theory. In practice, the R21 grant is used to fund studies like this one at Dartmouth.
In another study funded with this R21 grant, which NIH awarded to research sexual dysfunction in women, this Dartmouth experimenter – who has received millions in tax dollars from the NIH since the mid-1980s and has two current grants, including the R21 – took female rats, removed their ovaries, gave them hormones, and applied a local anesthetic (lidocaine) to numb their vaginas. They found it made no major difference in the mating rhythms of these rats.
In yet another study from this R21 grant, this experimenter severed the nerves that connect rats’ genitalia to their brains and found that these rats showed abnormal sexual behavior, even though they still desired sex.
Do these studies at Dartmouth seem likely to provide the R21 criteria of “novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools, agents, targets, and technologies that have the potential to substantially advance biomedical research”?
If this is NIH’s idea of “breakthrough” or “revolutionary” science, one can only imagine what its “normal” science looks like. For an analysis of the kind of research the NIH should be funding, see the IDA Recovery Act report on promising but under funded non-animal methods of research, below.
Funded by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD).
RESOURCES
DISSECTION / TESTING
RELATED: Evidence collected by the NAVS inside British laboratories provides the widest and most accurate picture available of life and death for lab animals:
Vodpod videos no longer available.
IDA Report on Under-Funded Non-Animal Tests
God Wants the Pope to be a Vegan
A message from Arthur Poletti to Pope Benedict XVI
His Holiness, Pope Benedict XVl
benedictxvi@vatican.va
Dear Most Holy Father,
Being the Pope is not easy. Sometimes, with God’s guidance you must go against the status quo when you are certain you are right about a controversial subject and take a FIRM stand against overwhelming odds.
No matter what the majority of the people in the world may think or say.
Especially when YOUR HOLINESS KNOWS you are supporting and promoting THE WILL OF GOD.
I am sure you will agree that God is the supreme symbol of compassion, kindness, life, and love for all creatures with a soul, which proves why God wants all animal factory farms and slaughterhouses to close, yes?
Your Holiness, for this reason you should seriously consider the significance of God’s will and the multitude of benefits that would most certainly occur if you stopped eating animal flesh and dairy products and announced to the world that you are A VEGAN.
Your announcement that you have stopped eating animal flesh and dairy products will promote — VEGANISM — like never before, and it will convince millions of people that you are PERSONALLY SUPPORTING your love and GOD’S LOVE FOR ALL ANIMALS, setting the precedent for many religious leaders and government officials throughout the world to appreciate and emulate.
Holy Father, your historic action of becoming the FIRST VEGAN POPE will send a powerful message throughout the world, like a “lightning bolt from heaven,” that God and “Your Holiness” want factory farms and slaughterhouses to close ending the hideous torture and MASS MURDER of billions of God’s precious creatures.
Many immediate urgently-needed benefits for animals, humans, the earth, and the earth’s atmosphere will most certainly occur as well as a multitude of endless residual benefits, all because of your COURAGEOUS announcement.
Thank you, Your Holiness, for your important consideration and most needed action promoting *THE WILL OF GOD* and GOD’S love for all animals.
Respectfully.
Arthur Poletti
USA
Author of the essay:
GOD IS A VEGAN — https://ourcompass.wordpress.com/essays/god-is-a-vegan/
Author of the short story: GOD DOES NOT EAT MEAT
Read for FREE online at: http://www.all-creatures.org/book/gdnem.html
From PlanetGreen
By Mickey Z.
Planet Green: So many humans call themselves “animal lovers” and often exhibit incredible compassion toward certain species…while seemingly having no problem with eating/consuming other species. How do you address this paradox in your book?
Melanie Joy: I wrote my book to examine this very paradox and, perhaps more importantly, to explore why most people aren’t even aware of such a paradox. My book is based on my doctoral research on the psychology of eating meat; as a vegan who had spent most of my life eating animals, I wanted to understand how it had been possible for me — a person who loved my dog like a family member and who even considered myself an animal lover — to eat animals on a regular basis without any thought whatsoever of the profound inconsistency in my attitudes and behaviors toward animals. And, as you point out, my experience is far from unique; most people care about animals and don’t want them to suffer.
Most of the beef that people eat has been dead for months and in many cases for years. The meat is disguised with bleach and dyes in many cases to hide the decay and the fact that the flesh is putrid.
And yet most people eat animals, often multiple times a day, a behavior that enables the intensive, extensive, and unnecessary suffering of tens of billions of nonhuman beings every year. What I discovered is that the reason we love certain animals and eat others is because there is an invisible, widespread belief system, or ideology, that conditions us to harbor very different perceptions of and behaviors toward different animal species.
I call this belief system carnism. Carnism is essentially the opposite of veganism or vegetarianism. We tend to assume that only vegans and vegetarians have a belief system when it comes to eating (or not eating) animals, and that eating animals is a given, rather than a choice. But when eating animals isn’t a necessity for survival, as is the case in the majority of the world today, it is a choice—and choices always stem from beliefs. Most people don’t love dogs and eat pigs, for instance, because they don’t have a belief system when it comes to eating animals.
Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: Book Trailer
Vodpod videos no longer available.
PG: Can you explain more about the term “carnism?”
MJ: Carnism is a violent ideology that enables humane people to participate in inhumane practices without realizing what they’re doing. The tenets of carnism run counter to the core values of most people; most of us would not willingly support unnecessary violence toward other sentient beings. So carnism, like other violent ideologies, must employ a set of defense mechanisms which operate on both a social and psychological level to ensure the participation of the populace; without popular support, the system would collapse. The primary defense of the system is invisibility, and the primary way the system remains invisible is by remaining unnamed: if we don’t name it, we can’t see it, and if we can’t see it we can’t challenge or question it.
The system also defends itself by teaching us to justify eating animals, by promoting what I refer to as the Three Ns of Justification: eating animals is normal, natural, and necessary. (Not surprisingly, these same arguments have been used to justify other violent ideologies as well.) There are many other carnistic defenses, but all defenses serve the same purpose: to “numb” us, psychologically and emotionally, when it comes to eating (certain) animals. Carnism disconnects us from the truth of our experience, blocking our awareness and shutting down our empathy.
PG: Captain Paul Watson has said that meat-eating humans are actually “necrovores” because “Humans eat dead flesh and rarely eat the organs, preferring the muscle tissue. Most of the beef that people eat has been dead for months and in many cases for years. The meat is disguised with bleach and dyes in many cases to hide the decay and the fact that the flesh is putrid. We are closer in our eating habits to vultures and jackals than wolves and lions.” Do you feel this distinction is important in advancing a plant-based diet?
MJ: I feel that it’s important for people who eat meat to understand what it is they’re consuming, and in that sense yes, I do think that such a distinction is useful in advancing a plant-based diet. However, I don’t find the term “necrovore” to be quite accurate, since the suffix “vore” refers simply to eating, and not to the deeper belief system that informs the eating. In fact, I believe all of the terms we commonly use to describe those who are not vegetarian or vegan are inaccurate.
For instance, sometimes we refer to those who eat animals as “carnivores” or “omnivores.” But both of these terms describe one’s physiological disposition, not one’s ideological choice: an omnivore is an animal, human or nonhuman, that can ingest both plant and animal matter and a carnivore is an animal that needs to ingest flesh in order to survive. (“Carnivore” and “omnivore” also reinforce the assumption that eating animals is natural, one of the most compelling myths used to justify carnism.)
And we sometimes use the phrase “meat eater,” but this phrase suggests that eating meat is somehow divorced from a belief system, as though it’s only vegans and vegetarians who bring their beliefs to the dinner table. Consider how we don’t call vegans “plant eaters,” because we recognize that eating plants is a behavior that reflects an underlying ideology. For the reasons mentioned above, I use the term “carnist” to describe those who eat animals. Carnist is not meant to be pejorative; it is merely meant to be descriptive of one who acts in accordance with carnism — just as “capitalist,” “Buddhist,” or “raw foodist,” for example, describe those who act in accordance with a particular ideology.
PG: Vegans often ask for advice on how to reach meat eaters, or “carnists.” What do you suggest?
MJ: I think it’s essential that vegans and vegetarians fully understand carnism, so they can understand what I refer to as the “carnistic mentality” and therefore advocate more effectively. In fact, I wrote my book to reach out not only to carnists, but to help vegans and vegetarians better communicate with the carnists in their lives and to whom they advocate.
The system also defends itself by teaching us to justify eating animals, by promoting what I refer to as the Three Ns of Justification: eating animals is normal, natural, and necessary. (Not surprisingly, these same arguments have been used to justify other violent ideologies as well.)
Amendment 1 – Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Two of the endearing principles of the Nation of the United States are FREEDOM and TOLERANCE.
NICE PRINCIPLES AT FIRST GLANCE. BUT,
How much are we supposed to tolerate?
Are we supposed to tolerate animals being tortured in the name of religion?
Are we supposed to tolerate beautiful young humans being driven to suicide in the name of religion?
Should religions that advocate murder of non-believers be tolerated?
Should religions be allowed to influence society to drive sensitive human beings to suicide?
Should religions that advocate “harm” to animals or humans be allowed free expression in public?
CLICK THE LINK BELOW NOW, PLEASE, TO SIGN PETITION and LETTER PROTESTING ADVICE OF A RELIGIOUS LEADER TO INFLUENCE SOCIETY TO OPPOSE A HUMAN’S BASIC RIGHT TO HIS AND HER OWN SEXUAL IDENTITY.
https://ourcompass.wordpress.com/2010/10/02/vigil-for-society%E2%80%99s-casualties/
BEAUTIFUL YOUNG HUMANS ARE SELF-ABORTING THEIR MISSIONS TO PLANET EARTH, BECAUSE OF THE INTOLERABLE PAIN BROUGHT UPON THEM BY A SOCIETY INFLUENCED BY ARCHAIC, ANCIENT, RELIGIOUS HATRED TOWARDS THEM.
Please Urge Jimmy Choo & Other Designers to Ditch Exotic Skins

Immediate, please sign and send TWO automatic messages:
From PETA
Recent undercover footage obtained by Swiss TV station Schweizer Fernsehen shows snakes as they are skinned alive and crocodiles, alligators, and other reptiles as they are bludgeoned to death with hammers before their mutilated bodies are thrown onto a bloody pile. This investigation mimics what was found in undercover investigations in Indonesia and in the U.S. It can take hours for these animals to die. Although many people might not be as familiar with reptiles as they are with the dogs and cats they share their lives with, reptiles suffer every bit as much when they are beaten, abused, and killed.
And let me tell you how a python jacket is often made. Snakes are taken from the wild to be skinned … this takes place in Africa, South east Asia and India. The snake is starved to make the skin looser – but there is another, even more terrible stage in the process.
A tube is put down the python’s throat and it is inflated with water to stretch the skin on the still-living animal.
Then he is nailed by his head to a tree and the skin is sliced off. The snake is then left in a heap to die. This can take several days. Daily Mail
A growing number of designers, including Stella McCartney and Marc Bouwer, have chosen to create wonderful work without using exotic-animal skins. After receiving video footage from PETA, several companies—including Nike (and its affiliate Cole Haan), H&M, Victoria’s Secret, and Overstock.com—implemented policies banning exotic-animal skins.
Please take a few moments to urge Jimmy Choo to exclude exotic skins from its collections HERE and also please sign Designers, stop using Exotic Skins.
A small amount of your time will make a huge difference for these animals who are too often forgotten.
Warning, graphic footage
RELATED:
Please send a message: No More Elephants at Zoológico Nacional

Please Send a Message to El Salvador:
No More Elephants at Zoológico Nacional
On September 21 Manyula, the only elephant at El Salvador’s Parque Zoológico Nacional de San Salvador, died at age 59 from kidney failure. She had lived in the zoo for almost her entire life, having been abducted from her family in India as a baby, and died without ever knowing the companionship and comfort of another elephant again. We need your help to ensure that the zoo does not acquire another elephant and subject her to a similar lifetime of deprivation.
Manyula arrived at the zoo in 1955, where she was kept in a tiny enclosure. Elephants naturally live in large family groups, in which female offspring remain with their mothers for life, yet Manyula spent her life entirely alone.
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Though deprived of all that was natural to her, Manyula was a national icon, beloved by the people of El Salvador, hundreds of whom turned out for her burial at the zoo. Now, a group of misguided Salvadoran businessmen wants to replace Manyula with another elephant.
Please help IDA convey the message to Salvadoran officials that the zoo should not hold elephants at all, and that it should instead use its resources to improve the welfare of other animals at the zoo and to pursue its mission of preserving and protecting native species who are threatened with extinction.
![]()
Please personalize the form HERE (use Spanish if you know the language!) to e-mail Dr. Héctor Samour, Secretary of the Ministry of Culture, the agency that oversees the Parque Zoológico Nacional de San Salvador, and San Salvador Mayor Norman Quijano. Urge an end to the display of elephants at the zoo.
Please be polite. If you live in El Salvador or are of Salvadoran descent, please include that information.
Submit the form HERE to send your comments to:
- Mayor of San Salvador, Norman Quijano
- El Salvador’s Secretary of Culture, Dr. Hectór Samour
Eliminate the Rape Kit Backlog

Immediate, from Human Rights Watch, please sign and send automatic message:
Eliminate the Rape Kit Backlog
Every year, more than 200,000 individuals report their rape to the police. Almost all are asked to submit to the collection of DNA evidence from their bodies, which is then stored in a small package called a rape kit. It is an invasive and sometimes traumatic process that takes four to six hours to complete. But the potential benefits are enormous: testing of the DNA evidence in a rape kit can identify an unknown perpetrator, confirm the presence of a known assailant, corroborate the victim’s account of the rape, and exonerate innocent suspects. Unfortunately, in the United States today there are an estimated 400,000-500,000 untested rape kits sitting in police evidence storage facilities and crime labs across the country.
Given that rape has the lowest reporting, arrest, and prosecution rates of all violent crimes in the United States, the revolution in DNA technology could strengthen the criminal justice response. As National studies have shown, cases in which a rape kit was collected, tested, and found to contain DNA evidence are more likely to move forward in the criminal justice system. For example, when New York City began to test every booked rape kit the arrest rate for rape skyrocketed from 40 percent to 70 percent of reported cases.
A Survivor’s Story
Vodpod videos no longer available.
Conversely, untested rape kits typically represent lost justice for rape victims, as they often mean a rape investigation was cut short before the offender could be brought to justice. Rape kit testing is not just useful in “stranger rapes,” but is also especially useful to corroborate a victim’s account in the majority of rapes, so-called “acquaintance rapes.”
Number of rape kits estimated to be untested nationwide: 180,000.
In 2004 Congress attempted to eliminate the rape kit backlog by passing the Debbie Smith Act, but more is needed. The Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act of 2009 will solve the rape kit backlog by requiring law enforcement to prioritize rape kit testing and account for the number of untested rape kits in their storage facilities, and will help ensure a victim’s experience in the aftermath of a sexual assault is as painless as possible.
Please urge your Members of Congress to support and co-sponsor the bipartisan Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act of 2009.
When a woman is raped in the United States, police collect evidence from her body and the crime scene for a “rape kit.” But rape kits often go untested, denying victims a chance for justice. With HRW’s Sarah Tofte and victims’ rights advocate Valerie Neumann. Listen to the Story:
From Human Rights Watch Podcast: Untested Rape Kits
The Shocking Numbers On Untested Rape Kits
As a teenager, Helena Lazaro was raped; it was over a decade before the authorities properly investigated her case. And the numbers suggest that Lazaro is far from the only one ill-served by the system.
Lazaro’s experience is recounted in detail in this month’s Marie Claire; the whole piece is worth reading, if difficult to get through, but here are some hard facts gleaned:
Age Lazaro was when she was raped by a 45-year-old trucker: 17.
Number of years it took for her rape kit to be opened, despite her repeated follow-ups: 13.
Amount of dollars it costs to test a rape kit: 1,500.
Number of women, in addition to Lazaro, her attacker is known to have raped: 2.
Number of victims the average rapist is likely to attack, according two studies: 7, 11.
Number of rape kits estimated to be untested nationwide: 180,000.
Number of unsolved rapes of the past five years: 150,070.
Number of untested rape kits Human Rights Watch found last year in Los Angeles alone: 12,669.
Percentage of the 7,974 rape kits Illinois police stored between 1995 and 2009 that were confirmed to have been tested: 20.
Portion of Illinois law enforcement agencies responding to the query to arrive at that figure: 1/3.
Number of days within which Illinois police now have to test rape kits, thanks to the new Sexual Assault Evidence Submission Act, the first of its kind: 10.
Read more: http://jezebel.com/5610550/the-shocking-numbers-on-untested-rape-kits#ixzz11mnBsgq1
I Used to Think the Law Would Protect Me: Illinois’s Failure to Test Rape Kits
RELATED:
Immediate, please sign and send automatic message:
Help prevent introduction of bullfighting to the United Arab Emirates!
BACKGROUND
Our French/German colleague organization Stop Corrida informed us about an initiative to start organizing bullfights in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), namely in Abu Dhabi. Several French and Spanish media reported about this initiative.
It is said that in June 2010, meetings between bullfighting promotor Simon Casas and Prince Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan of Abu Dhabi took place and that several bullfighters would be interested in the initiative. The first bullfights are planned for November 20-24 2010, according to bullfighting aficionados. There is even talk about building a bullring.
Stop Corrida and CAS International sent emails to the authorities in the United Arab Emirates and the embassies in Germany, The Netherlands and Belgium. The embassy in Germany assured us that they are 90% sure that the UAE are not interested in bullfighting, but of course we want to be 100% sure about this. Since the bullfighting industry in the traditional bullfighting countries (such as Spain and Mexico) is dealing with more and more losses, they are trying to expand their bloody business to other countries.
We want to make sure they do not succeed in organizing bullfights in the United Arab Emirates, as we also prevented bullfights in China, Russia and other countries.
Please send an email to the authorities in the United Arab Emirates HERE
CAS International and the Spanish political party for the animals PACMA produced a video (see below, first video in playlist) about the cruel fiesta Toro de la Vega in Tordesillas, Spain.
The video contains images of our joint demonstration on 12 September 2010 in Tordesillas, but also of the torture and killing of bull Platanito, who was stabbed to death with lances by more than 100 men on horse and on foot on 14 September 2010.
By showing this video, we hope to inform many people about what happens every year in Tordesillas and what we are doing to stop this once and for all. We also hope that the outrage about this horrible ‘festival’ will increase in Spain, so politicians are forced to end this animal suffering.
Vodpod videos no longer available.
RESOURCES FROM CAS
CAS International has gathered as much information on bullfighting and cruel fiestas as possible, to inform people about the cruelties committed against bulls and other animals. Attention! This information can be shocking.
Read more about:
If you don’t understand the Spanish expressions, you can look in our glossary.
There are also a lot of myths concerning bullfighting. Please take a look here to see several myths.
In the United States, Brazil, Germany, Australia, Canada and other countries, cattle and horses are severely maltreated during rodeos. The American organization SHARK, the German organization Initiative Anti-Corrida and the British organization FAACE work hard to abolish these atrocities.
Tips for tourists
As a tourist, you can also help us in our struggle to end bullifighting. A few tips:
- Never go to a bullfight or a cruel fiesta, not even once. If you go to these cruel events, your money and presence supports this bloody industry. Ask other people to follow your example.
- Do not buy any bullfighting souvenirs, especially not at bullrings.
- Let shop owners know (in a polite manner) why you don’t want to buy these souvenirs. You can use our Spanish, French or Portuguese letter. (Also below.)
- Do not eat or drink in bars and restaurants that promote bullfighting.
- Send polite letters to media and (travel) organizations that promote bull suffering. Please inform us about it.
- Ask the host of your travel organization to not promote bullfighting. If he/she indeed promotes bullfighting, please contact us, so we can address the issue ourselves.
- Please check our website on a regular basis, for protest campaigns and the latest news.
Firefighters watch house burn, animals die. International firefighters group slams fee as ‘pay to play’

In terms of “crime”, which is worse? Not paying a fee or allowing animals and a home to die? Life, decency, and integrity take precedence, and once again, humans have proven to be incapable of such. I have no words for the disgusting display of apathy and immorality. And for what? $75.00? Way to demonstrate that the dismissal of life and ethics come so cheaply, so much for being heroes to animals, your communities and children must be so proud.
Immediate, please sign:
Tell Obion County Sheriff Danny Jowers It’s Not Ok To Let Animals Burn To Death
Related, Our Compass will revise once available:
Philanthropy Team Mobilizing Thousands of Pet Lovers to Protest Tennessee Mayor and Fire Chief
From The Raw Story
Requiring residents outside of city limits to pay a $75 fee for fire protection is an ill-advised and unsafe policy, according to the International Association of Fire Fighters.
On September 29th, the South Fulton Fire Department in Tennessee refused to extinguish a fire ignited at the house of Gene Cranick. Because Cranick’s home is in a rural area outside of city limits, he is required to pay a fee to the city for protection, but claims he forgot to pay.
Although no members of the Cranick family were harmed during the fire, three dogs and a cat perished. The house was left to burn to the ground, but the fire department protected their neighbors, who had paid the fee.
The International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) has condemned the “pay-to-play” policy of South Fulton.
Although no members of the Cranick family were harmed during the fire, three dogs and a cat perished.
“The decision by the South Fulton Fire Department to allow a family’s home to burn to the ground was incredibly irresponsible,” President of the IAFF, Harold Schaitberger, said in a statement. “We condemn South Fulton’s ill-advised, unsafe policy. [Firefighters] shouldn’t be forced to check a list before running out the door to see which homeowners have paid up.”
“Anybody that’s not in the city of South Fulton, it’s a service we offer, either they accept it or they don’t,” said the Mayor of South Fulton, David Crocker.
Mayor Crocker claims to have looked at the issue of rural fire protection “100 different ways,” but has not yet found a better solution to the problem than the $75 dollar fee. Comparing the policy to auto insurance, Crocker says if the fire department operated on a per-call basis, there would be no incentive for those outside of the city’s limits to pay the fee.
Vodpod videos no longer available.
“We are a city fire department,” said city manager Jeff Vowell. “We are responsible for the City of South Fulton and we offer a subscription (to rural residents). If they choose not to, we can’t make them.”
Pundits on both sides of the political spectrum have also weighed in on the incident.
On his radio show Tuesday, Glenn Beck said, “What is the $75 for? To keep the firemen available, to keep the fire trucks running, to pay for the fire department to have people employed to put the fire out.”
“If you don’t pay the 75 dollars, then that hurts the fire department,” continued Beck. “They can’t use those resources, and you’d be sponging off your neighbor’s resources.”
On MSNBC’s Countdown Monday, Keith Olbermann blasted South Fulton’s “a la carte government,” mocking it as an example of “Tea Party America” where “you have to pay taxes for the fire department, plus a special fee.”
On the other hand, one left-leaning blogger thinks the tea party shoe is on the other foot.
From PCRM
Immediate, please sign:
Ask the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center to End the Use of Pigs in ATLS Courses
Please take a minute to let University of Pittsburgh Medical Center executive vice president and chief medical officer Marshall Webster, M.D., know that you want him to stop the use of live pigs in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) courses. We have provided text for you, but if you decide to write your own message, please be polite and encouraging. Here are some talking points:
- Please replace the use of animals in UPMC’s ATLS courses.
- Human-based training methods have been approved to teach these procedures by the American College of Surgeons.
- Ninety-five percent of ATLS courses in the United States use TraumaMan or other human-based methods.
- Of the 12 ATLS courses in Pennsylvania, UPMC’s is the only one that still uses live animals.
Click the “Send Your Message” button and your e-mail will automatically be sent to Dr. Webster. [Zip code is optional for non U.S. members]
RELATED
People For Reason: Big Pharma – Big Fraud
Vodpod videos no longer available.
PETA Germany Protests Stone-Age Trauma Training
Written by Alisa Mullins
US friends, please Ask Congress to End the Military’s War on Animals
Update: Government officials in Oberpfalz have denied on ethical grounds the U.S. Army’s second application for a permit to conduct trauma training exercises. Previously, an Army contractor withdrew its application for trauma training after facing intense public opposition, and last month an application from Deployment Medicine International, another Army trauma training contractor, was denied by officials in the German state of Thüringen. Animals 4, Army 0.
Victory! Massive Monkey Prison Kicked Out of Puerto Rico City

travlinman43/CC by 2.0
From PETA
Bioculture—a company that sells nonhuman primates to laboratories—has been dealt a massive blow after the municipality of Guayama, Puerto Rico, and its mayor, Glorimari Jaime Rodríguez, unanimously approved two landmark ordinances banning the import, export, breeding, and use of monkeys in experiments.
Bioculture must now terminate its plans to capture more than 4,000 wild monkeys, confine them to cages, breed them in Guayama, and sell their offspring to laboratories for use in painful and deadly tests.
Bioculture’s client list included hideous labs such as Shin Nippon Biomedical Laboratories, Charles River Laboratories, Pfizer, and Covance, among others.
PETA, other organizations, world-renowned primatologist Jane Goodall, and Puerto Rico–born actor Benicio del Toro have campaigned hard to get Bioculture’s cruel plan stopped. We protested the company and joined Guayama residents in filing a lawsuit, which prompted a Superior Court judge in Puerto Rico to temporarily halt construction of the facility because of Bioculture’s flagrant violation of local laws.
In case Bioculture has ideas about setting up shop elsewhere in Puerto Rico, we have also worked with Sen. Melinda Romero Donnelly, who sponsored Senate Resolution 1514 to formally urge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture not to grant any licenses or permits to Bioculture for the importation and breeding of animals in Puerto Rico. The resolution is being considered by the Senate right now.
RELATED
Vodpod videos no longer available.
November 4, 2009. In front of the legislature of Puerto Rico. We oppose Bioculture Laboratories building a monkey breeding facility in Guayama, Puerto Rico. Its purpose is to breed monkeys to import to the US for experimenting and torturing. Animal experiments are ineffective. Animals and humans are biologically different. We have not found cures to cancer or aids. Animal testing is a waste of money and inaccurate! We need to progress and use alternative testing like in-vitro, molecular science, human tissues, cadavers and more. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2W_DpWED_o






















































