Dissection | Testing Files
Files the take, share, download
I have provided updated links to companies that DO and DO NOT test on animals. However, please note that some of the other information may be outdated or links may not work. Please contact us if you have questions.
- Please click your back button to return to this list.
- Please click HERE to return to Dissection | Testing
Animalearn’s Humane Educational Kit
Animals in Education Fact Sheet (#1 Teacher)
Comparative Studies of Student Performance
Student Advocate- Making a Difference for Non-Human Animals in Colleges and Universities
Snapshot of Betrayal: From Best Friend to Lab Tool
Humane Science Education- Making the Grade
Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education
Dying To Learn, Exposing the Supply and Use of Dogs and Cats in Higher Education
2023: Click here for PETA’s Companies That DO NOT Test on Animals
2023: Click here for PETA’s Companies That DO TEST On Animals
Compassionate Shopping Product Guide
Medical Charities: Support Compassion, Not Suffering
BUAV-Approved Cosmetic Companies
PCRM’s Good Medicine, Summer 2010
Animal Care Annual Report of Activities 2007
Science Bank Testing Alternatives
Animalearn’s Humane Educational Kit
Animals in Education Fact Sheet (#1 Teacher)
Cost Comparison
Comparative Studies of Student Performance
Dissection & Students’ Rights
Student Advocate- Making a Difference for Non-Human Animals in Colleges and Universities
Snapshot of Betrayal: From Best Friend to Lab Tool
Humane Science Education- Making the Grade
Reaching for the Future- The Evolution of Humane Science Education
Dying To Learn, Exposing the Supply and Use of Dogs and Cats in Higher Education
Compassionate Shopping Product Guide
Medical Charities: Support Compassion, Not Suffering
BUAV-Approved Cosmetic Companies
PCRM’s Good Medicine, Summer 2010
Animal Ingredient List: Click HERE
Editor’s Note: In the US vivisectors are required to report on tested animals; however, beyond this industry duplicity, vivisectors are not required to report on the majority of animals used for testing because they are NOT covered by the AWA (Animal Welfare Act) and are thus EXCLUDED from reporting as non-mandatory reporting “subjects”. Furthermore, the AWA, while excluding most animals abused for research, does offer coverage for dead animals. Yes, that’s correct: DEAD animals have “rights” whereas most live ones do not … Furthermore, for those who idiotically and unethically champion that animals are “cared for”, if you insist on such nonsense, offer yourself and then we can debate the ethics of subjecting non-consenting beings to ludicrous, redundant, and cruel testing. And, in 2007 alone, greater than 77,000 animals were denied pain relief based on the theory that introducing pain relief would compromise testing results. (Animal Care Annual Report of Activities, Fiscal Year 2007) I have to wonder, do you demonstrate this much kindness to your family members?
SAEN Vivisection Facts 2009
Animal Care Annual Report of Activities 2007
AWA Q & A
Science Bank Testing Alternatives
Our Compass 