Skip to content

Through a Glass, Darkly, and Out the Other Side

September 30, 2010

From Psychology Today: Bear In Mind
By G. A. Bradshaw

Today, Flo turns 53. However, there is little for her to celebrate. After a ten-year hiatus, she and 185 other chimpanzees are scheduled to resume their brutal existence as biomedical subjects. They are being sent from the protected Alamogordo Primate Facility back into research at the Southwest National Primate Research Center. [1][2]

Laboratory chimpanzees routinely experience hundreds of “knockdowns” (anesthetization by dart gun) and procedures that include liver punches, wedge and lymph node biopsies; and infection with HIV hepatitis NANB and C virus. They live in terror and pain. In addition to physical debilitation, laboratory inmates acquire a diversity of symptoms sufficient to fill the DSM: self-injury, seizure-like episodes, screaming, panic attacks, trance states, acute anxiety, depression, hyper-aggression, anorexia, dysphoria, and the list goes on. Given the unrelenting horror of their experiences, the most straightforward diagnosis is Complex Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). [3]

Science is well beyond demonstrating human-chimpanzee mental and emotional comparability. [4] [5] Indeed, there is ample evidence that chimpanzee capacities exceed humanity in many ways [6] and the fact that they don’t do to us what we do to them demonstrates their superior ethics. And yet, this widely accepted knowledge has yet to be implemented in policy and law. Responsibility for the disconnect between what we know and what we do does not lie with lawmakers alone. The science community at large is deafeningly silent and complicit. [7]

Honesty, Thomas Jefferson wrote, is the first chapter in the book of wisdom. As professionals dedicated to promoting mental wellbeing, psychologists are ethically compelled to take a page from Jefferson’s book and that of Dr. John P. Gluck, former director of a primate lab and professor of University of New Mexico and Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University. [8]

Mid-career, Gluck saw through to reality and chose to act on this knowledge by dedicating his science and psychology to this truth. Here he reflects on the profound implications for American science and psyche if we continue using our closest relatives as sacrificial human surrogates and fail to match ethics with knowledge.The title of his compelling essay is, Chimpanzees, Research and Decisions:

It is ironic that on the same day that Dr. John VandeBerg, director of the Southwest National Primate Research Center, forcefully presented his case to the people of Alamogordo to move the chimpanzees from their protected Alamogordo Primate Facility (APF) environment back into research at the Southwest National Primate Research Center in San Antonio, the Parliament of the European Union voted to ban all biomedical research with great apes. [9] How could such well-meaning people, who share much in the way of culture and ethical tradition, come to such different conclusions? A review of the European debate, which is very similar to our own in its level of controversy, shows that this decision was grounded in the recognition that apart from a mentally competent researcher deciding to run a risky test on themselves, when science involves the generation of harms to sentient animals like chimpanzees, justification requires more than clear scientific goals but also a balancing of the harms within the context of potential achievements and broad central social and ethical values. Beyond this, the Parliament declared that if a dimension of medical progress requires the use of the great apes, that progress must await the development of non-ape alternatives. This was obviously a difficult conclusion to reach. However, the consensus among the Parliament was that the harms that would be produced in the Apes by holding them in laboratory environments and exposing them to the required experimental procedures were so extreme that their core ethical values could not allow them to sanction the work. In other words, they affirmed that there was a point where the ethics of sympathy and compassion for suffering in research animals takes precedence over even the need for medical progress. It is a statement that basic decency, from which all ethical principles arise, at times takes precedence over even our fears of disease and death.


The systems of ethical thought that we share with most of the world, whether religious or secular, call on morally serious people to be vigilant about whether our justifications for various actions are coherent or are being overwhelmed by personal fears and desires that limit appreciation of other crucial considerations. The structure of an ethical life in animal research requires a similar practice. As scientists we must be prepared to change course and sacrifice elements of our self-interest when we determine that pursuing our goals requires too much in the way of pain and suffering from the animals that we are able to acquire. Therefore, deliberation about the ethical grounds for the return to research of these chimpanzees requires that we try to honestly examine the nature of our motives and the burdens imposed by our decisions.

In the article, Dr VandeBerg expresses complete certainty that the costs to the chimps by virtue of laboratory captivity, those that were seen as ethically objectionable by the European Parliament, are sufficiently remediated by providing the chimps with group living, air conditioning, superior medical care, and TV sets. Certainly the housing that he describes is far better than what I observed when I first visited the colony in 1973. Then, the animals lived a cramped and isolated existence in facilities that resembled a medieval prison. Even given these improvements, perhaps he should question himself further about whether he really knows that the lab comforts he describes are so “ideal.” After all, isn’t it true that our knowledge of who the great apes are as individuals and what matters to them is still in its infancy? What we do know about them so far is that it is a lot like looking in the mirror. When left to their wild lives chimpanzees live in groups with shifting membership, they form political power alliances, have sex, fight, and raise offspring. They make tools for termite fishing, honey gathering, and cracking nuts. They travel and explore, accessing seasonal fruits, seeds and medicinal plants; and they guard the boundaries of their territory. At night they choose camp sites and build nests to suit their individual preferences. And of course, they deal as best they can with disability and death; a full cycle of life. It is obvious that only disconnected fragments of this kind of life are possible, even with friends and a color TV in the cage. Is it not also possible that because of their inability to communicate with us in detail through a shared language that there are layers of pain and distress that remain hidden and unknown to us? Estimating the extent of harms and pleasure in another self-governed being is a perilous activity and requires humility.

Dr. VandeBerg asserts that his concern for suffering humans and animals is the driving force of his research resolve. I do not question his motives, in fact I respect them. However, given even the harms to the chimps that we know about, ought not researchers like Dr. VandeBerg also ask themselves whether their desires for prominence, promotion and fortune also play a part? Might these factors be more powerful than they would prefer to acknowledge? After all, researchers are human and are subject to the distortions created by raw desire and ego like all mortals. He also gives the impression that if the chimps cannot be returned, research on important diseases will stop. I think that he is underestimating the ingenuity of scientists to find alternative non-animal routes to discovery. Could this experimental focus on Chimps possibly be at all influenced by the fact that he is the director of National Primate Research Center? I know that when I was a Director of a primate laboratory my research ideas were shaped by that fact alone. I needed to constantly justify the importance of my lab, so that when I considered a research project, the use of primates always had priority.


To his credit, Dr. VandeBerg expresses the hope that research on the chimpanzees will result in vaccines that will serve as cures for diseases that plague wild ape populations as well as humans. He does not mention, however, that many of these shared illnesses – polio, measles, respiratory infections – were initially spread to apes thanks to local human, tourist, and researcher contact. He also uses this wedge to justify chimp studies of HIV by asserting that there is evidence of a chimp AIDS “epidemic” in Africa. Beyond a troubling report in 2009 that 17 chimpanzees infected with a monkey virus that was related to a virus that causes AIDS in humans seemed to have shorter lives and sicker offspring, I cannot find any evidence of the “AIDS epidemic” to which he refers. Perhaps he meant to reference the true epidemic of the Ebola virus that has killed one third of the African gorilla population along with thousands of chimpanzees in recent years. He did not mention plans to offer help in this case.

Indeed, those of us who reject the transfer plan must also reflect on our motives. Are we failing to appreciate the extent of the medical need? Are we being deluded by a desire to create a fantasy world where the hard realities of animal life do not exist? Has the level of our skepticism grown into a paranoia that filters out the existence of honest and caring researchers and underestimates the ability of animals is adjust and create a decent life for themselves in the lab?

We all have a lot of soul searching to do. In the meantime, let us leave the chimps where they are, protected from all of us. It is the only decent thing to do.


[1] Chimps fate ignites debate. Nature 467, 507-508 (2010). Retrieved September 27, 2010 from

[2] A listing of 245 chimpanzees held at APF — separated by decade of birth. The current population is 215 (190 on site and 25 at New Iberia), according to data provided by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in April 2010. Project R & R: Releases and Restitution for Chimpanzees in U.S. Laboratories. Retrieved September 27, 2010 from…

[3] Bradshaw, G.A., T. Capaldo, G. Grow, & L. Lindner. 2008. Building an inner sanctuary: trauma-induced symptoms in non-human great apes. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation. 9(1), 9-34.

[4] Bradshaw, G.A., and R. M. Sapolsky. 2006. Mirror, mirror. American Scientist, 94(6), 487-489.

[5] Bradshaw, G.A. T. Capaldo, G. Grow, & L. Lindner. 2009. Developmental context effects on bicultural Post-Trauma self repair in Chimpanzees. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1376-1388.

[6] Young Chimps Top Adult Humans In Numerical Memory
ScienceDaily. December 9, 2007. Retrieved September 27, 2010 from

[7] Bradshaw, G.A. 2009. The Scientist’s Bark, Huffington Post. October 15, 2009. Retrieved September 27, 2010 from…

[8] John P. Gluck, Ph.D. Faculty member, The Kerulos Center, Emeritus Professor of Psychology, University of New Mexico, and faculty member, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University. Email: jgluck(a)

[9] Research facility director says cost is worth price in chimpanzee test arena. Alamogordo Daily News, September 7, 2010.


Dr. Barbara Alving, Director, NCRR
National Institutes of Health
Building 31, Room 3B11
31 Center Drive, MSC 2128
Bethesda, MD 20892

Dr. Francis Collins, Director, NIH
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, MD 20892

FYI, Dr. Collins’ number is 301-496-2433, that is his office, as confirmed via NIH’s own directory and by the person who answered. They are transferring people to Cindy McConnell, who is in charge of communications; her number is: 301-435-0751.  I left a message with the woman who insisted on transferring me to McConnell, and then I left a message with her, McConnell, too.

Ask them to reconsider NIH’s misguided decision and to retire and keep the APF chimpanzees in New Mexico. Remind them that millions of tax dollars were wasted in high per diem fees paid to Charles River Laboratories for their poor care (CRL guilty of IMMENSE torture and murder); that the chimpanzees deserve the safety and comforts of sanctuary; and that U.S. taxpayers deserve better decision making on how our precious dollars are spent.

Here are some points to consider:

  • Tell them you object because published studies have documented the enormous suffering chimpanzees endure in laboratory life and use. What’s more, the research of geneticist Dr. Jarrod Bailey and others have shown that the past 30 years of using chimpanzees to study AIDS, cancer, hepatitis C, and other diseases has failed to provide breakthroughs in prevention, treatment or cures for humans. The business of chimpanzee laboratory housing and use is a waste of tax dollars and time. NIH/NCRR must be held accountable.
  • Remind them that the U.S. remains the last developed nation using chimpanzees in invasive research and that chimpanzees are a unique part of New Mexico history. New Mexico now has a chance to give these individuals peace and dignity while keeping jobs in the state.
  • Ask them to please stand up for what’s right before it’s too late — keep the Alamogordo Primate Facility chimpanzees in New Mexico, help permanently retire them, and turn APF into a model sanctuary of chimpanzee care.

For more information on efforts to end all chimpanzee research, visit
To get involved in local efforts on behalf of the chimpanzees at APF, go to


I am writing to ask that you permanently retire from research the approximately 200 chimpanzees at the Alamogordo Primate Facility (APF) in New Mexico, instead of moving them to Texas for use in invasive experiments. Under the Chimpanzee Health, Improvement, Maintenance & Protection (CHIMP) Act of 2000, you have the authority to retire them to the federal sanctuary system.

The chimpanzees now face being shipped elsewhere for use in invasive experimentation. Some of the remaining Alamogordo chimpanzees were used in space flight research by the U.S. Air Force before being used for decades in research and testing at a privately run facility that was responsible for 35 chimpanzee deaths between 1993 and 2001. Due to their advanced age, health issues, and history of use in HIV and hepatitis research, many of the chimpanzees have already experienced tremendous suffering with no conclusive results due to the fact of the inefficiency and ineffectiveness of animal testing. Furthermore, animal experimentation is highly unethical, causing immense suffering, pain, and fear; given the similarities between chimpanzees and humans, you can only conclude that to subject them to further testing is no different than conducting such invasive testing on non-consenting humans.

This retirement is ethically sound and makes financial sense. Creating a sanctuary in Alamogordo would ensure the continued employment of dozens of New Mexico residents who would lose their jobs if the animals are transferred. Gov. Bill Richardson and local business leaders have also called for these animals to stay in Alamogordo and for a sanctuary to be created there. In addition, because renovations are required at the Texas research facility where the chimpanzees are slated to be sent, retiring the animals in New Mexico would be a far better use of my tax dollars.

Take action, find out what you can additionally do HERE and HERE

RELATED INFOS (as referenced above)

View this document on Scribd

View this document on Scribd


6 Comments leave one →
  1. karen lyons kalmenson permalink
    September 30, 2010 12:19 pm

    “science” you cruelly demonstrate
    all these things we have come to hate
    you have shown that man is
    callous and cruel
    and looks at other species
    as nothing more than objects
    or tools
    what have we learned due
    to your foul hands
    that “scientists” have
    not yet evolved
    into man:(


  2. Coleen Darni permalink
    September 30, 2010 12:22 pm

    We cannot continue the barbaric and inhuman practice of experimenting on animals. For any reason. To use the excuse that it has been going on for a very long time is no excuse. It is criminal. We know that the animals used in laboratories, and specifically here, primates are of very high intelligence, and feeling and emotional beings, all experiencing the same feelings and emotions as you and I. Fear, confusion, grief, anger…all emotions that they are forced to go through, alone, in a cage, abused, tortured, taunted and murdered. The raising of consciousness among those who would elect themselves leaders is imperative.
    Stop the practice of animal experimentation and vivesection. IT IS CRIMINAL, INHUMANE, and UNACCEPTABLE.


  3. TRACEY robinson permalink
    September 30, 2010 12:57 pm




  4. September 30, 2010 3:26 pm

    What is the matter with You ? There’s no reason for Animals to suffer. What is this great breakthrough Your working on….. a new deodorant ? We don’t need animals in research anymore wise up.


  5. MICHELLE MOREL permalink
    September 30, 2010 4:02 pm



  6. Karen Cassidy permalink
    October 6, 2010 10:44 am

    This is unjust and unfair cruel treatment ! Why not do this to murderers in jail, why pick on innocent animals ! Who is the beast here ? Leave these poor Chimps and all animals alone! I hope you all reap what you sew !


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

World Animals Voice

Animal news from around the world.


spiritual enlightenment and self improvement

The Bruges Vegan

more than waffles and chocolate

DirtNKids Blog

Soil, Kids, Vegan -- Connected Through Nature

Amici del Lupo - Svizzera italiana

per sensibilizzare e farlo conoscere...

Animalista Untamed

The only good cage is an empty cage

Jet Eliot

Travel and Wildlife Adventures

Organic Opinion

Finding it, aye there's the rub~

Eat No Harm

Living consciously for our planet, the animals, and ourselves.

Flawless Pandemonium

Question everything~

Veganism is Nonviolence

Being Vegan Is A First Step To A Nonviolent Life

The Biotrotter

The Globetrotting Biologists

Kim Saeed: Narcissistic Abuse Recovery Program

Narcissistic Abuse Recovery | Narcissist Abuse Support | Narcissistic Abuse Recovery Program


for the earth and the animals

Nepali Today

Coffee break Photo Blogs Base In Tokyo, Japan.

Friendly Fairy Tales

Celebrating Nature and Magic for Kids of all Ages

Arcilla y fuego

Una visión sobre el complejo y apasionante mundo de la cerámica

%d bloggers like this: