Skip to content

URGENT, THIS IS WAR: Your signature is needed to BAN horse slaughter

October 20, 2011
by




Please click on and sign Support a Ban on Horse Slaughter


Background | From Persian Horse’s Blog

Certain Petitions atWE THE PEOPLE,  the New White House Petition Site, will be considered by the Obama Administration upon reaching 5000 Signatures.

As of 10/20/2011, the PRO Horse Slaughter Petition has 5129 Signatures…. The Petition to BAN Horse Slaughter now has 5591 Signatures.

If we want to Save Horses, we NEED at least 5000 more signatures on OUR Petition to BAN Horse Slaughter within the next 3 days.

CLICK ON THE FOLLOWING LINK TO SIGN PETITION TO BAN HORSE SLAUGHTER

https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions/!/petition/support-ban-horse-slaughter/q30gJg1k?utm_source=wh.gov&utm_medium=shorturl&utm_campaign=shorturl


Related | Horse Slaughter: There is only one choice

Vodpod videos no longer available.




See More: The Persian Horse’s Blog

our horses wish
to run
wild and free
safe in their
horse society
they were not
meant to
be more meat
on man’s plate
these exquisite,
sentient beings
deserve a much
happier fate!!!!

Karen Lyons Kalmenson


15 Comments leave one →
  1. patty peek's avatar
    October 20, 2011 6:08 pm

    karma

    Like

  2. Katharine Rich's avatar
    Katharine Rich permalink
    October 21, 2011 1:42 am

    Please we Must Stop the evil horrible murders of God’s beautiful horses!! Begging everyone to sign and share to save the horses from ever being slaughtered here in USA or brutally shipped across our borders…Lets come together to stop the EVIL!! Thanks you!

    Like

    • shannon's avatar
      shannon permalink
      January 20, 2012 10:04 am

      i agree horses deseve rights :,(

      Like

  3. karen lyons kalmenson's avatar
    October 21, 2011 6:49 am

    our horses wish
    to run
    wild and free
    safe in their
    horse society
    they were not
    meant to
    be more meat
    on man’s plate
    these exquisite,
    sentient beings
    deserve a much
    happier fate!!!!

    Like

  4. Art Owen's avatar
    October 21, 2011 10:13 pm

    WHO IS GOING TO WIN THIS WAR. ??? SLAUGHTERHOUSE SUE? or THE HORSES, WITH OUT HELP…..BETTER SIGN AND SHARE THIS PETITION EVERY 15 MINUTES ….PEOPLE ACTUALLY WANT TO EAT THEIR OWN HORSES. SIGN THIS PETITION NOW ANIMAL LOVERS……

    Like

  5. Maruka Ledesma's avatar
    October 22, 2011 8:51 am

    Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are all still savages. Roman Rolland, Nobel Prize, 1915

    Like

  6. Cheryl Lang's avatar
    October 22, 2011 4:27 pm

    Who will feed all the horses that are being sent to slaughter? Will all of you offer to donate a year’s worth of hay to anyone in your town or a rescue? We have horses and have gone without to feed them. I love them, I take care of them, and they get what they need. I got laid off my job 3 years ago and cannot find a decent job; the one I took is very part time, pays less than I made 20 years ago, but gives me a discount on the feed I so desperately need. Have I tried to sell them? Yes. But they are beloved, and I will not sell them to known kill buyers or dealers that I know will, nor will I sell them to bad homes. There are MANY people in the same – or worse spot we are. So before you start preaching – maybe you should start shouting for HUMANE SLAUGHTER or put your money up front and support the rescues that are bursting at the seams. We are trying – all of us. We support each other, we help with rescue, we’ve pastured other’s animals when we could. We’ve gone into debt, maxed our credit, sold everything we own. BTW – can’t even refinance, because we haven’t missed a payment. Go figure.
    So – do you think that closing the USA slaughter to horses helped or hurt? Should we have spent more money/resources/energy working towards HUMANE SLAUGHTER? You DO realize that now the horses are still shipped around the country, then shipped into Canada, Mexico, and even Japan?
    I have a radio show, Pets, Rescue, Etc on internetradioamerica and would love to spend an hour on this. Anyone game?

    Like

    • Stacey's avatar
      October 22, 2011 4:40 pm

      Cheryl, I can appreciate there are those who are in financial straits. However, there is no such thing as humane slaughter. If you cannot feed others, maybe you cannot feed yourself, and maybe you should humanely slaughter yourself. Sounds awful, doesn’t it? Well, let’s take all those who cannot feed others, including human and non-human animals, the homeless, those in homes, shelters, hospices. Let’s kill them all! All of them – whether young, old, fit, handicapped, formally financially stable, poor, destitute, formally rich, helpless: kill them all! Kill them humanely, though, we’ll get rid of them all so that others can finally feel better about their own lives.

      Yeah, thought you’d think otherwise …

      As for me putting my money where my mouth is to feed them – what about those who are responsible for them? I feed cats – a lot of them, and I don’t kill any of them. Why? Because if I don’t believe in killing people who are homeless, I don’t believe in killing animals. Speciesism is dangerous, as is the “humanely killed” moniker.

      Why don’t you put your money where your mouth is and start killing your family off, one by one, humanely …

      I know it sounds shocking, but it is just as shocking for animals.

      Oh, and I don’t agree with shipping them to other countries to be slaughtered either. Maybe they should be sterilized, and maybe there should be NO MORE RACING! Illegalize animals for racing, testing (premarin), and any other forced breeding. Those numbers will go down, guaranteed.

      Like

      • Cheryl Lang's avatar
        October 22, 2011 4:50 pm

        And so, your proposal is??? Turn them loose to fend for themselves as many all over the country are doing with not only horses, but dogs, cats, parrots, llamas, alpacas, mules, etc?
        And can’t slaughter be humane? Just because one kills/eats an animal doen’t mean one must terrify it first. And before you go all vegetarian/vegan on me, we don’t eat animals, either.
        Specieism may be dangerous, but no less so than trying to put humans and other animals on equal ground.
        By the way, it IS possible to disagree without being disagreeable.

        Like

      • Stacey's avatar
        October 22, 2011 5:01 pm

        No, slaughter cannot be humane. It’s an oxymoron, I don’t understand how that can be so difficult to accept. When is taking the life of a being humane? Just because you stun an animal it’s okay to kill him/her? And by the way, slaughter numbers negate stunning. Many animals are skinned or dismembered while still conscious. Is that humane? If you cannot guarantee a painless, unknowing death, what do you do?

        I am vegan, and my proposal is to not kill, Use those racing dollars and premarin subsidies to feed those whose “owners” are incapable of doing so themselves. Killing should never be the answer.

        Like

      • Kristy's avatar
        Kristy permalink
        October 23, 2011 9:46 pm

        You are so ignorant it isn’t funny! Do some research and open up your eyes, your ignorance and everyone elses is causing horses more suffering, not saving anything!

        Like

        • Stacey's avatar
          October 23, 2011 10:33 pm

          Strawman arguments by opponents means I automatically win if this was a debate. You should look it up – do some research – and see how your position is really not a position at all – you bitch and moan yet offer nothing except insults and immaturity.

          Again, though, killing is inherently immoral regardless of man’s law and circumstances. I don’t cause horse suffering, the people who auction them off for the slaughterhouse are the ones who do. The people who breed them in high numbers for sports and testing are the ones. The family who cannot take care of its horse is the one, too.

          If you are not willing to sacrifice yourself, then you should be repulsed by even the notion of slaughtering an animal. It’s despicable. Grow the fuck up.

          Like

  7. Maruka Ledesma's avatar
    October 24, 2011 7:36 am

    Every day in countries around the world, animals are fighting for their lives. They are enslaved, beaten and kept in chains to make them perform. They are mutilated and confined to tiny cages so that we can kill them and eat them. They are burned, blinded, poisoned, and cut up alive in the name of “science”. They are also electrocuted, strangeld and skinned alive, so that people can parade in their coats; and worse.
    Animals around the globe are counting on compassionate people like you to give them a voice and be their “heroes” by learning about the issues they face and taking action. Each of us have the power to save animals from nighmarish suffering and best of all; it’s easier than you might think.
    The time has come Ladies and Gentlemen, to stop thinking of animal rights as distracting or less deserving of our time and energy than other struggles for social justice. As Martin Luther King, Jr., said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere”. All oppression, prejudice, violence, and curelty are wrong and must be rejected no matter how novel the idea or how inconvenient the task.
    For those who think that we will never be able to achieve the dream of liberation from oppression, not just for human beings, but for all beings, regardless of race or gender or species, I have just three words for all of you: YES, WE, CAN. Thank You!

    Like

  8. shannon's avatar
    shannon permalink
    January 20, 2012 10:08 am

    horses all around the world die this is the chart… over 100,000 horses a year dies from slaghter!!
    please help and stand up
    HORSES HAVE RIGHTS
    PLEASE REPLY………………………….

    Like

  9. acne treatment algorithm's avatar
    October 3, 2014 10:52 pm

    Very good article! We will be linking to this particularly great content on our
    site. Keep up the good writing.

    Like

Leave a reply to Art Owen Cancel reply