Skip to content

Court Upholds Expulsion of Counseling Student Who Opposes Homosexuality

July 28, 2010
by

Editors’ Note: What do you think and with whom do you agree? I support the school, freedom of religion should not guarantee protections for those whose beliefs harm others, especially when they are in opposition to a stated, ethical purpose in an interactive, trusting atmosphere, as deemed important by counseling. In the other view, however, as my brilliant co-editor has pointed out, a school should not have the right to expel a person over her refusal to do something against her religion, much like a medical university expelling a medical student because he refused to perform vivisection against his moral principles in order to pass a class. Hm. Interesting point. What do YOU think?

Fox News

A federal judge has ruled in favor of a public university that removed a Christian student from its graduate program in school counseling over her belief that homosexuality is morally wrong. Monday’s ruling, according to Julea Ward’s attorneys, could result in Christian students across the country being expelled from public university for similar views.

“It’s a very dangerous precedent,” Jeremy Tedesco, legal counsel for the conservative Alliance Defense Fund, told FOX News Radio. “The ruling doesn’t say that explicitly, but that’s what is going to happen.”

U.S. District Judge George Caram Steeh dismissed Ward’s lawsuit against Eastern Michigan University. She was removed from the school’s counseling program last year because she refused to counsel homosexual clients.

The university contended she violated school policy and the American Counseling Association code of ethics.

“Christian students shouldn’t be expelled for holding to and abiding by their beliefs,” said ADF senior counsel David French. “To reach its decision, the court had to do something that’s never been done in federal court: uphold an extremely broad and vague university speech code.”

Eastern Michigan University hailed the decision.

“We are pleased that the court has upheld our position in this matter,” EMU spokesman Walter Kraft said in a written statement. “Julea Ward was not discriminated against because of her religion. To the contrary, Eastern Michigan is deeply committed to the education of our students and welcomes individuals from diverse backgrounds into our community.”

In his 48-page opinion, Judge Steeh said the university had a rational basis for adopting the ACA Code of Ethics.

“Furthermore, the university had a rational basis for requiring students to counsel clients without imposing their personal values,” he wrote in a portion of his ruling posted by The Detroit News. “In the case of Ms. Ward, the university determined that she would never change her behavior and would consistently refuse to counsel clients on matters with which she was personally opposed due to her religious beliefs – including homosexual relationships.”

Ward’s attorneys claim the university told her she would only be allowed to remain in the program if she went through a “remediation” program so that she could “see the error of her ways” and change her belief system about homosexuality.

The case is similar to a lawsuit the ADF filed against Augusta State University in Georgia. Counseling student Jennifer Keeton was allegedly told to stop sharing her Christian beliefs in order to graduate.

Keeton’s lawsuit alleged that she was told to undergo a reeducation program and attend “diversity sensitivity training.”

University officials declined to comment on specifics of the lawsuit but released a statement to FOX News that said Augusta State does not discriminate on the basis of students’ moral, religious, political or personal beliefs.

Tedesco said both cases should be a warning to Christians attending public colleges and universities.

“Public universities are imposing the ideological stances of private groups on their students,” he said. “If you don’t comply, you will be kicked out. It’s scary stuff and it’s not a difficult thing to see what’s coming down the pike.”

The Alliance Defense Fund told FOX News it will appeal the ruling.

Share

2 Comments leave one →
  1. Judy's avatar
    Judy permalink
    July 28, 2010 7:42 pm

    Maybe the key determining words in determing what is morally right or wrong, are “harm others”. Did the student’s refusal to counsel homosexual patients, due to her concept of religious morality, “harm anyone”….. Perhaps there is a Higher Law over and above Legal Law or Moral Law, which is simply “Harm No One”…but then, of course, Harm is embodied in the Feelings or psyche of the Recipient of Such Harm. So if the Recipients of the student’s refusal to counsel them based on her principles of religious morality, felt harmed, then they were harmed..Each case would be different I would think..Some homosexuals might feel Harmed by being counseled by a person who is against homosexuality, thereby receiving negative judgemental counseling – such as preaching, so in that case, would also be “harmed”

    Like

  2. Deb Conner's avatar
    Deb Conner permalink
    July 28, 2010 9:17 pm

    I support the Court’s decision 100%. It is readily apparent that this young woman was expelled from the university’s program due to her refusal to counsel homosexual students, simply because their ‘lifestyle’ offended her. How dare she claim SHE was discriminated against! This case is similair in nature to the pharmacist who refused to fill prescriptions for birth control pills, and the ‘morning after’ pill because both violated HIS belief system. Not their call to make, plain and simple

    Like

Leave a comment